www.davidhegg.info

195. Correct facts

Regarding the situation at the office, when the person gave me something to drink; my memory started to become unstable and indistinct, after I now first had remembered some crisp and clean things from that situation in 1975. For a day or two, I struggled with this confusing memory. But after that; I understood that it was the person, who influenced me, who had influenced me to get this intangible memory. The person has influenced me to get wrong “memory hallucinations” about that sequence also.

These wrong “memory hallucinations” were that the person behind the desk, started to influence me with talk. And it was the effect of what I had drunk, that made that possible for him. But, that wasn’t how it was. The influences didn’t start before the person who influenced me, started to influence me. I think that the intention with that influence, is to give the substance I had drunk, the role of having done it possible to influence me. I think this is the first step in a change, of what had happened. This first step is then the beginning of a gradual complete change, which is that all of this has gone on at other places, by other people, in other ways, and that it is something else. I think the intention with this first step, only is to work behind the other influences, in a way I never should have found out.

This “memory hallucination” was among other things, that the person behind the desk sat and enjoyed, that he could begin to say to me, that he don’t like me. He didn’t like that I worked there. He had only thought of the job I was doing, to get me into his office, and get me to drink that glass. The job was unnecessary. It was unnecessary for me to come and look at something, because it wasn’t something. It was unnecessary to come to the corridor. It was unnecessary to come into his office. It all was only to get me to drink the contents of that glass. Now you will be “a porridge head” (an idiot) he said, and smiled happy.

Another “memory hallucination” was that we went upstairs, to come from where I worked and to the office. This is also wrong. I worked in the same story as the office.

What we really talked about in the beginning, was about that I worked there. It can also be correct; that he started to ask me about where I had grown up, and that he asked me different questions about that. That seems as if it can be correct. This is something faint, which at the same time is crisp and clean.

When I started to remember wrong about this, that started to destroy my thoughts and memory about it. After I understood correctly, and started to remember correctly again; that got my thoughts and memory in order again. This is something clear; that my mind became disconnected and unclear because of “the memory hallucinations”, and that my mind become in order again, when I understood correctly. I also remember much clearly, about what happened before all of this happened that morning, Monday, December 29, 1975. To remember correctly about what happened, in the days and minutes before this happening that morning, has been useful for me. That brings in correct facts in my mind.

December 1, 2017, David H. Hegg